Long-Term Outcome After Histopathological Complete Response with and Without Nodal Metastases Following Multimodal Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the long-term survival after pathological complete response (pCR) with and without nodal metastases and associated recurrence following multimodal treatment of esophageal cancer. The recurrence pattern after pCR is of importance for different postoperative surveillance strategies. METHODS: A cohort of 890 patients with esophageal cancer received neoadjuvant therapy followed by transthoracic esophagectomy. Only patients with pCR of the primary tumor with and without nodal metastasis were analyzed. A clinicopathological database was set up and completed with long-term follow up information on recurrent disease. RESULTS: The specimen of 201 patients (23%) demonstrated pCR, 84% without (ypT0N0) and 16% with residual nodal disease (ypT0N+). For ypT0N0 patients, the 5-year overall survival was significantly higher than for patients with metastatic nodes (77% vs. 24%) (p < 0.0001). Sixty-eight percent of patients had no evidence of tumor recurrence, whereas 32% had proven relapse. For patients with and without tumor recurrence, 5-year survival rates were 14% and 93%, respectively (p < 0.0001). For patients with recurrent disease, median survival time was 27 for locoregional, 44 for distant, and 24 months for combined recurrence (p = 0.302). In the multivariable Cox-regression analysis, node-positive disease predicted both locoregional and metastatic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological CR offers long-term survival in patients without nodal metastases but outcome significantly deteriorates with the presence of nodal metastases. Follow-up recommendations may therefore be adopted in patients with pCR. Furthermore, "watch-and-wait" surveillance strategies with suspected clinical complete response have to be considered with caution.

Targeting abundant survivin expression in liposarcoma: subtype dependent therapy responses to YM155 treatment.

PURPOSE: Liposarcoma (LPS) represent the largest group of malignant soft tissue tumours comprising a heterogeneous group of subtypes in which the degrees of chemoresistance and radiosensitivity strongly vary. Consequently, it is of utmost interest to establish novel therapeutic regimens based on molecular targets. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining of survivin was performed in tissue microarrays comprising 49 primary LPS specimens. LPS cell lines were treated with survivin antagonist YM155 and doxorubicin or etoposide alone as well as in combination. Changes in cell viability were investigated and the synergistic effect of a combined therapy analysed. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry revealed an abundant expression of survivin in LPS that significantly concurred with less-differentiated tumour subtypes and grading. In vitro, we demonstrated the impact of the survivin inhibitor YM155 on dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS) and, even more imposing, pleomorphic LPS (PLS) tumour cell viability with a strong induction of apoptosis. A combined treatment of doxorubicin or etoposide with YM155 augmented the cytotoxic effects on DDLPS and PLS cells. CONCLUSION: These findings support the significant role of survivin in the oncogenesis and progression of LPS subtypes providing a rationale to target survivin in eligible in-vivo models and to pioneer clinical applications of survivin-specific substances unfolding their therapeutic potential in LPS patients prospectively.

Localized and metastatic myxoid/round cell liposarcoma: clinical and molecular observations.

BACKGROUND: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS), a disease especially of young adults with potential for local recurrence and metastasis, currently lacks solid prognostic factors and therapeutic targets. The authors of this report evaluated the natural history and outcome of patients with MLPS and commonly deregulated protein biomarkers. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who presented to the authors' institution with localized (n = 207) or metastatic (n = 61) MLPS (1990 to 2010). A tissue microarray of MLPS patient specimens (n = 169) was constructed for immunohistochemical analysis of molecular markers. RESULTS: The 5-year and 10-year disease-specific survival rates among patients with localized disease were 93% and 87%, respectively; male gender, age >45 years, and recurrent tumor predicted poor outcome. The local recurrence rate was 7.4%, and the risk of local recurrence was associated with recurrent tumors and nonextremity disease location. Male gender was the main risk factor for metastatic disease, which occurred in 13% of patients. Forty percent of patients who had localized disease received chemotherapy, mostly in the neoadjuvant setting. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed significantly higher expression of C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGFR-ß) in metastatic lesions versus localized lesions. Tumors with a round cell phenotype expressed increased levels of CXCR4, p53, adipophilin, PDGFR-α, PDGFR-ß, and vascular endothelial growth factor relative to myxoid phenotype. Only the receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the AXL gene (AXL) was identified as a prognosticator of disease-specific survival in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the authors identified clinical and molecular outcome prognosticators for patients with MLPS as well as several potential therapeutic targets.

Combining EGFR and mTOR blockade for the treatment of epithelioid sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Molecular deregulations underlying epithelioid sarcoma (ES) progression are poorly understood yet critically needed to develop new therapies. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in ES; using preclinical models, we examined the ES EGFR role and assessed anti-ES EGFR blockade effects, alone and with mTOR inhibition. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: EGFR and mTOR expression/activation was examined via tissue microarray (n = 27 human ES specimens; immunohistochemistry) and in human ES cell lines (Western blot and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR). Cell proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion effects of EGFR and mTOR activation treated with erlotinib (anti-EGFR small-molecule inhibitor) alone and combined with rapamycin were assessed in cell culture assays. In vivo growth effects of erlotinib alone or with rapamycin were evaluated using severe combined immunodeficient mouse ES xenograft models. RESULTS: EGFR was expressed and activated in ES specimens and cell lines. EGFR activation increased ES cell proliferation, motility, and invasion and induced cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2, and MMP9 expression. EGFR blockade inhibited these processes and caused significant cytostatic ES growth inhibition in vivo. mTOR pathway activation at varying levels was identified in all tissue microarray-evaluable ES tissues; 88% of samples had no or reduced PTEN expression. Similarly, both ES cell lines showed enhanced mTOR activity; VAESBJ cells exhibited constitutive mTOR activation uncoupled from EGFR signaling. Most importantly, combined erlotinib/rapamycin resulted in synergistic anti-ES effects in vitro and induced superior tumor growth inhibition in vivo versus single agent administration. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR and mTOR signaling pathways are deregulated in ES. Preclinical ES model-derived insights suggest that combined inhibition of these targets might be beneficial, supporting evaluations in clinical trials.